🔗 Share this article

Itbecame clear he was able to withstand losing against Grimsby. Survive losing a crucial European final against one of the worst Spurs sides in living memory. He withstood home defeats against domestic rivals, finishing 15th, his rigid approach, undermining some of the club’s best homegrown talent, a poor winning percentage, labeling his team the worst the club has ever seen. But there was one adversary with whom the Portuguese coach was not permitted to tango. You come at the sporting director, you had better succeed.

Unfortunately, like many a Premiership defender in Blackburn’s title-winning campaign, Amorim took on Jason Wilcox and seems to have missed. The most distracted of readers can see the irony here: a manager who frequently berated his squad for losing one-on-one duels succumbing in the face of the white heat and formidable presence of a the Premier League’s most intimidating football executives.

In truth, this whole bruising episode appears to portray the director in a whole new light. It may have been tempting, based on his brief stint in a similar role at Southampton, to regard him as merely a drudge within the club's structure: a man whose appointment was due largely to his friendship with ex-colleague a fellow executive as any verifiable talent. How mistaken everyone was. In brilliantly outmanoeuvring the club's celebrated manager, just as he bested the hapless a previous executive earlier, Jason Wilcox has demonstrated as one of football's strategic masterminds: a strategic mind of which United’s mid-table rivals will now be rightly wary.

The Tactical Clash Over Formation & Ideology

For example, it was the director who having been part of the leadership that hired the rigid 3-4-3 advocate Amorim originally, played a key role in attempting to convince Amorim to ditch his beloved formation. Unsurprisingly, these entreaties faced pushback. However, such directives carry more weight when issued from the mouth with the impeccable football pedigree of Jason Wilcox, holder of three England caps and a contributor to a title-winning side from 31 years ago.

Maybe eventually he may be persuaded to explain his reasoning publicly. Maybe one day he might be asked why Amorim is departing with a full payout, with no compensation reduction clause activated. The director seldom speaks in public, and with very good reason. The real thinkers in football – men like him – function at a level beyond our own prosaic understanding. If he ever did speak, most likely we would perceive is a series of ultrasonic blips and complex calculations. Wanting is not quite the same as being prepared to receive.

An Supreme Authority Behind Command

Naturally, in training our focus on the sporting director we overlook the true genius behind the modern United throne. The director is, after all, simply carrying out the commands of his ultimate line manager Sir Jim Ratcliffe, who privately has made very clear his desire for a back four. According to reports, the owner has also proposed playing Bryan Mbeumo in a wing-back role. The owner is eager for United to embrace data science and analytics. Per reports, in an executive meeting early in his investment, he declared that the team's approach to football “shall be decided in this room”.

Ultimately, Ratcliffe is an expert in these intricate football matters, drawing from his background in industry and yachting. Above all he is incredibly rich, and as we all know, the rich are the best of us: more insightful, sagacious, more tactically astute, simply better. Who else could one trust to manage an enlightened programme of austerity, the construction of a modern arena that appears a lot like an abstract design, the signing of a new striker?

A Modern Football Hierarchy: Directors Over Coaches

This represents a shift we are increasingly seeing at the elite levels football. Historically, clubs foolishly entrusted major sporting choices to subordinate staff like managers, talent spotters – even footballers. Maybe previously feasible for a young, innovative manager with ideas and energy to join an organization and see their vision through to completion. Yet how many businesses have such individuals established? What number of large-scale layoffs have they overseen? Far preferable to invest the real power where it rightly belongs: the leadership tier, the casually dressed executives, the individuals with impressive LinkedIn profiles. Better by far to determine the strategy by the directors and hire someone who will adapt their offering to suit. If coaches were formerly chefs, they have become more akin to delivery personnel: not responsible for the product, yet finally accountable if it arrives cold or fails to meet standards.

Nowadays, a coach's role is increasingly not about defining the vision and more about selling it: the front-facing representative on the front desk, the public face of an organisation they have minimal power to influence. A coach at Chelsea leads a team of literal children into Europe and secures domestic cups, and effectively gets sacked for speaking out. A manager at Celtic finds his standing damaged while the people who appointed him continue to make errors another day.

A Neoliberal Football: Responsibility for the Few

And possibly on some microcosmic level this represents neoliberalism at work: the elevation of a gilded overclass who are infallible, whose decisions are always sacrosanct, whose errors can always be resolved by sacking without explanation. Hire the system coach only to dismiss them for using too much that system. Bring in the process guy and then discard him for requiring excessive time. And most importantly be grateful; for your modest increases in ticket costs, for your new summer signings, for the fact that the grownups – however well qualified – are in charge.